Results from the 2012 Ohio Forage Performance Trials are now available online at http://hostedweb.cfaes.ohio-state.edu/perf/. The report includes yield trials of commercial varieties of alfalfa, red and white clover, tall fescue, and annual ryegrass n tests planted in 2008 to 2012 across three sites in Ohio: South Charleston, Wooster, and North Baltimore. There is also a downloadable pdf file for easy printing of the results, as well as downloadable Excel files.
Forage yields were very respectable despite the dry summer, although our testing sites received more rainfall than many areas of Ohio in 2012. Yields averaged from 5.8 to 6.5 tons/acre for alfalfa, 5.6 tons/acre for red clover, 2.4 tons/acre for white clover, 5.7 tons/acre for tall fescue, and 6.3 tons/acre for annual ryegrass (planted in September 2011).
The results demonstrate the importance of selecting adapted varieties with a proven yield record across locations. In our trials in 2012, individual alfalfa varieties varied in yield from 14 to 20% depending on location. Improved red clover varieties yielded up to 53% more than common (VNS) medium red clover. White clover varieties differed in yield by as much as 12.6%, tall fescue varieties differed by up to 7% yield, and annual ryegrass varieties differed by up to 42% yield.
Links to forage performance trials in other states are included on the Ohio Forage Performance Trials website. One very useful link is an interactive website to compare alfalfa varieties across many locations (including Ohio data). It is important to consider yield not only close to home, but across several environments, because every year presents different weather conditions. Varieties with good yield performance across multiple environments are likely to produce more stable yields across soil types and years on your farm.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
South Central Ohio Grazing School
The "Pasture for Profit" will be held the
evening of December 4 and 6, 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm and concludes on Saturday,
December 8, 2012 9:00 am until noon. The program will be held at the Jackson
Agricultural Research Station, OARDC, 019 Standpipe Road, Jackson Ohio
45640.
The topics to be covered at the three day grazing school include; What is
MiG and What are Your Goals and Objectives of Your Grazing System?, Evaluating
Your Resources, Understanding Plant Growth, Grazing Economics, Forage Species
Selection, Grazing Systems and Contingency Plans for the Good, Bad and Ugly,
Paddock Layout and Design, Pasture Soil Fertility. Saturday, the last day of
the school will include a farm visit to view grazing management practices,
including fence and livestock watering systems in the field.
The $30 fee includes refreshments and a large notebook of reference
material. To register, make your check payable to Jackson SWCD, 2026 Fairgreens
Road, Jackson, OH 45640. For further information, contact the Jackson SWCD at 740-286-5208 or the Vinton County SWCD at 740-596-5676. Registration deadline is November 29,
2012.
Friday, October 19, 2012
USING ALFALFA AND GRASS HAYFIELDS AFTER FROST
Some Thoughts and Considerations
Rory Lewandowski, Extension Educator Wayne County and Crossroads EERA
We have had some frost over the past
week and one question that comes up is the use of alfalfa and/or grass
hayfields following a frost. Management
after a frost depends upon several factors. Was there a frost or a killing freeze? Is the
hayfield a legume or a grass stand? What are the needs and goals of the
hayfield’s owner.
Temperature is a consideration. A frost may burn the top of the plant, but
growth will still continue from the green, unburned leaf area. A killing freeze for alfalfa is generally
defined as a temperature in the 24 to 25 degree F range over a period of at
least 4 hours. After a killing freeze,
alfalfa is done growing and the plant can be cut for mechanical harvest,
grazed, or left to overwinter.
This
year, because of the drought, livestock producers need all the forage they can
get so many livestock owners are cutting hay fields regardless of the calendar
or weather forecast. Alfalfa is the
forage we generally hear a lot about regarding fall management. One reason for that is because alfalfa
regrows by mobilizing and using carbohydrate root reserves to produce new leaf
growth after a cutting. At some point,
there is enough new leaf area that sugars manufactured by photosynthesis meet
the plants growth needs plus have surplus to put back into root reserves. If management during the growing season has
left low levels of root reserves and now the plant is cut in the late fall,
burns more reserves to start growth, but the growing season ends before the plant can
grow enough leaves to restore those root reserves, then there is risk of the
plant dying over the winter. The reason
the recommendation is made to not cut alfalfa between about mid-September until
a killing frost is to protect those plant root reserves.
So, does this mean that all the alfalfa we have seen around the state that has been cut before a killing frost is going to die over the winter? No, while some stands will be hurt by this management, other stands will not, or only be impacted in a minimal way. That is because there are other factors that play a role in determining winter kill. Factors
that affect winter kill include cutting date in the fall which I have mentioned, but there is less winter kill risk when a fall cutting is taken on a
young vs. an old alfalfa stand, and less risk when the stand is planted on a
well-drained site. In addition soil fertility is important. Stands that have maintained good soil fertility, especially soil potassium levels and that have kept
soil pH close to that 6.8 level have reduced risk of winter kill. Finally growers who use improved
genetic varieties with good disease resistance and over wintering levels have reduced risk.
Sometimes
the question is asked if too much top growth can lead to smothering over the
winter. In alfalfa this is not an issue
because the leaves will dry up following a killing freeze, become brittle and
drop off the plant. The stem that
remains standing is not a concern for smothering the stand. Tall grass plants however can mat down. This mat can provide a habitat favorable for
disease development that could thin out the stand. For this reason, it is recommended that a
grass hay field with tall growth be cut or grazed before winter.
With our shorter days and cooler
temperatures it becomes very difficult to get a cut legume or grass to dry down
enough to bale as a dry forage. Wrapping
wilted forage or harvesting as baleage is the best mechanical option. Grazing a hayfield is usually a more economical
option as compared to mechanical harvest.
Use of temporary electric fencing can facilitate the grazing use of a
hayfield. While forages such as alfalfa,
clovers and cool-season perennial grasses do not produce toxic compounds after
a frost, bloat can be a concern when alfalfa or clovers are grazed after a
frost.
The risk of bloat is higher one to
two days after a killing frost and when livestock are grazing a pure or mostly
pure legume stand. The safest management
practice is to wait a few days after a killing frost before grazing pure legume
stands. At that point the forage will
begin to dry from the frost damage. If
animals are not accustomed to grazing high legume content stands, it is a good
idea to feed some dry hay before turning into the legume field, or move animals
into the legume field in the late morning or early afternoon after they have
been grazing another pasture so that they are not entering with an empty rumen.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Ohio Pasture Growth by September 23, 2012
The following table shows the growth from pastures participating in the project. For information about the project see the introductory post for this 2012 and the post describing the project. The information is reported in pounds of dry matter grown per acre per day. It contains the reported results as of the posting date. Some reports may be delayed for various reasons. Previous week’s information is updated when it is received. The current table will reflect the total information available.
Week Starting | Fields sampled | Minimum | Maximum | Average | Past 7 yr Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(no.) | (pounds of DM per day) | ||||
Mar 25 | 18 | 5.3 | 126.2 | 57.2 | na |
April 1 | 14 | 6.7 | 92.6 | 36.3 | 73 |
April 8 | 17 | 5.1 | 102.9 | 39.5 | 55 |
April 15 | 21 | 3.3 | 156.9 | 42.7 | 72 |
April 22 | 14 | 5.1 | 99.7 | 44.6 | 82 |
April 29 | 25 | 3.6 | 188.9 | 57.3 | 79 |
May 6 | 35 | 0.9 | 134.7 | 62.7 | 86 |
May 13 | 22 | 7.5 | 129.1 | 54.9 | 94 |
May 20 | 16 | 0 | 115.1 | 56.4 | 78 |
May 27 | 25 | 1 | 95.1 | 50.6 | 62 |
June 3 | 20 | 0 | 115.1 | 38.3 | 54 |
June 10 | 19 | 3.5 | 120.7 | 34.6 | 50 |
June 17 | 16 | 6 | 93 | 30.8 | 47 |
June 24 | 13 | 0 | 58.8 | 19.7 | 48 |
July 1 | 21 | 0 | 58.7 | 21.2 | 52 |
July 8 | 27 | 0 | 76.7 | 18.9 | 38 |
July 15 | 28 | 0 | 27.1 | 4.7 | 36 |
July 22 | 29 | 0 | 134 | 14.4 | 35 |
July 29 | 37 | 0 | 74.4 | 23.9 | 51 |
Aug 5 | 34 | 0 | 124.4 | 25.8 | 37 |
Aug 12 | 27 | 0 | 120.2 | 31.5 | 31 |
Aug 19 | 31 | 0 | 105.9 | 25.1 | 41 |
Aug 26 | 28 | 0 | 101 | 15.1 | 27 |
Sept 2 | 30 | 0 | 73.5 | 17 | 34 |
Sept 9 | 25 | 0 | 88.5 | 30.6 | 24 |
Sept 16 | 22 | 0 | 58.2 | 30.1 | 36 |
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Ohio Pasture Growth by September 9, 2012
The following table shows the growth from pastures participating in the project. For information about the project see the introductory post for this 2012 and the post describing the project. The information is reported in pounds of dry matter grown per acre per day. It contains the reported results as of the posting date. Some reports may be delayed for various reasons. Previous week’s information is updated when it is received. The current table will reflect the total information available.
Week Starting | Fields sampled | Minimum | Maximum | Average | Past 7 yr Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(no.) | (pounds of DM per day) | ||||
Mar 25 | 18 | 5.3 | 126.2 | 57.2 | na |
April 1 | 14 | 6.7 | 92.6 | 36.3 | 73 |
April 8 | 17 | 5.1 | 102.9 | 39.5 | 55 |
April 15 | 21 | 3.3 | 156.9 | 42.7 | 72 |
April 22 | 14 | 5.1 | 99.7 | 44.6 | 82 |
April 29 | 25 | 3.6 | 188.9 | 57.3 | 79 |
May 6 | 35 | 0.9 | 134.7 | 62.7 | 86 |
May 13 | 22 | 7.5 | 129.1 | 54.9 | 94 |
May 20 | 16 | 0 | 115.1 | 56.4 | 78 |
May 27 | 25 | 1 | 95.1 | 50.6 | 62 |
June 3 | 20 | 0 | 115.1 | 38.3 | 54 |
June 10 | 19 | 3.5 | 120.7 | 34.6 | 50 |
June 17 | 16 | 6 | 93 | 30.8 | 47 |
June 24 | 13 | 0 | 58.8 | 19.7 | 48 |
July 1 | 21 | 0 | 58.7 | 21.2 | 52 |
July 8 | 27 | 0 | 76.7 | 18.9 | 38 |
July 15 | 28 | 0 | 27.1 | 4.7 | 36 |
July 22 | 29 | 0 | 134 | 14.4 | 35 |
July 29 | 37 | 0 | 74.4 | 23.9 | 51 |
Aug 5 | 34 | 0 | 124.4 | 25.8 | 37 |
Aug 12 | 27 | 0 | 120.2 | 31.5 | 31 |
Aug 19 | 26 | 0 | 105.9 | 28.2 | 41 |
Aug 26 | 22 | 0 | 101 | 14.6 | 27 |
Sept 2 | 20 | 0 | 66.7 | 15.4 | 34 |
Friday, August 10, 2012
Ohio Pasture Growth by August 5, 2012
The following table shows the growth from pastures participating in the project. For information about the project see the introductory post for this 2012 and the post describing the project. The information is reported in pounds of dry matter grown per acre per day. It contains the reported results as of the posting date. Some reports may be delayed for various reasons. Previous week’s information is updated when it is received. The current table will reflect the total information available.
Week Starting | Fields sampled | Minimum | Maximum | Average | Past 7 yr Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(no.) | (pounds of DM per day) | ||||
Mar 25 | 18 | 5.3 | 126.2 | 57.2 | na |
April 1 | 14 | 6.7 | 92.6 | 36.3 | 73 |
April 8 | 17 | 5.1 | 102.9 | 39.5 | 55 |
April 15 | 21 | 3.3 | 156.9 | 42.7 | 72 |
April 22 | 14 | 5.1 | 99.7 | 44.6 | 82 |
April 29 | 25 | 3.6 | 188.9 | 57.3 | 79 |
May 6 | 35 | 0.9 | 134.7 | 62.7 | 86 |
May 13 | 22 | 7.5 | 129.1 | 54.9 | 94 |
May 20 | 16 | 0 | 115.1 | 56.4 | 78 |
May 27 | 25 | 1 | 95.1 | 50.6 | 62 |
June 3 | 20 | 0 | 115.1 | 38.3 | 54 |
June 10 | 19 | 3.5 | 120.7 | 34.6 | 50 |
June 17 | 16 | 6 | 93 | 30.8 | 47 |
June 24 | 13 | 0 | 58.8 | 19.7 | 48 |
July 1 | 21 | 0 | 58.7 | 21.2 | 52 |
July 8 | 26 | 0 | 76.7 | 18.4 | 38 |
July 15 | 25 | 0 | 22.5 | 4.2 | 36 |
July 22 | 26 | 0 | 134 | 14.7 | 35 |
July 29 | 32 | 0 | 74.4 | 18.1 | 51 |
Monday, July 16, 2012
Drought Management: Stick to Grazing Principles
Rory Lewandowski, Extension Educator Wayne County and Crossroads EERA
Every
Monday for the past couple of months on the OSU Extension crop team conference
call I have heard Jim Noel from the National Weather Service say that across
Ohio we are in a pattern of above average temperatures and below average
rainfall. These are not encouraging
words for a grazier to hear. This isn’t
the type of forecast conducive to good pasture growth. Summer pasture growth is dependent upon
rainfall and pasture management.
Rainfall we can’t control.
Management though is a different story.
So what’s your plan to manage through a hot, dry summer?
Regardless
of the weather pattern, you should stick to what you know as a grazier, as a
manager of pasture plants. Those pasture
management principles that you learned at a grazing school, or through a
grazing council, or from an experienced grazier will serve you in good stead
through this weather pattern. Let’s
review those principles and how they are applied when it is hot and dry.
The take
half, leave half principle must be followed during the summer months. That remaining leaf area provides a
photosynthetic base for plant regrowth, shades the soil to keep the soil
temperature cooler, and it helps to reduce soil moisture loss. Do not cheat on this principle during hot,
dry spells. It is critical to maintain a
4 inch grass height to get the benefits mentioned. Maintaining this leaf
residue provides the grass plant the best opportunity to take advantage of
those spotty rain events that are common to hot, dry years, allowing regrow
much sooner than overgrazed pasture paddocks.
The second principle that must be
adhered to is to provide a rest period that is sufficient to allow plants to
grow back to a practical grazing height.
The height at which grazing should begin is somewhere in the 8 to 10
inch range. Obviously the two principles
work hand in hand. In practice this
means that grazing rotations slow down during hot, dry periods. It is easy to do just the opposite.
Grass is growing slowly. In order to maintain a 4 inch residual I move
my livestock into the next paddock a little early. Maybe the grass is only 7 inches tall. If I want to maintain a 4 inch residue, I’ll
have to leave this paddock a little sooner than the time my livestock can
normally graze in this paddock. The
grass in my next scheduled paddock is only 6 inches tall. Maybe I should just let them graze this
current paddock down a little bit lower, say 3 inches. This pattern continues and soon I am either
grazing down to a 2 inch height, which pretty much stops regrowth during 90
degree days with no rainfall, or I am trying to get my livestock to only take
off an inch or two of grass growth, which is pretty tough to do. The end result is that paddock moves are
speeding up and leaving behind paddocks that are overgrazed. The next rotation puts me in even worst
shape.
What’s the answer? Stick to what you know. Maintain a leaf residue of about 4 inches and
do not start a grazing pass unless the paddock is 8 to 10 inches tall. Impossible!
The grass is not growing fast enough.
Yes, I know. That means you must
have a sacrifice area in order to maintain these grazing principles and protect
the majority of your pasture paddocks.
The sacrifice area might be a barnyard lot or maybe it is a pasture
paddock. If it is a pasture paddock it
will get overgrazed and beat into the dirt while you wait for sufficient
pasture growth to resume your grazing rotation.
It means that hay will have to be fed.
While this is not a desirable
situation, a worse disaster is overgrazing every paddock, ending the grazing
season in July, negatively affecting next year’s grazing season, and facing an
extra-long period of hay feeding beginning in late summer. By sticking to what you know, and using a
sacrifice area, you make the best of a tough situation and put yourself in the
position to be able to resume grazing when rainfall starts again and
temperatures cool down. There is still
the possibility of stockpiling grass for late fall and winter grazing because
you have protected most of your grass plants.
Feeding some hay while in a sacrifice lot is really using hay as a
management tool. The end result will be
less total hay fed in the year if grazing is able to resume later in the summer
and throughout the fall. Feeding hay in
the summer in a dry lot beats feeding hay late in the fall or winter in cold
and/or muddy conditions. In some cases,
depending upon hay supply, and when rainfall might resume again, reducing
livestock numbers may have to be considered as well.
Finally, if the sacrifice lot must
be a pasture paddock, choose one where some renovation is needed and new
improved pasture varieties can be planted.
Ideally this might be a paddock where you could do some tillage after
your pasture rotation begins again. This
would provide the option to plant a late summer forage option such as a cereal
grain like oats, wheat or rye or a brassica like turnips. Any of these forages could provide some fall
and early winter grazing. The paddock
would then be set up for an early spring planting to return to a perennial
pasture mix.
Hot, dry summers are a challenge to
the grazier. Pasture management is the
only factor that can be controlled.
Stick to what you know as you make those management decisions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)